Knowledge hub
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Knowledge hub

Perfect place for all science researchers

Welcome to science.forumakers . Register here for lifelong membership.
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Cosmic Architecture
Cosmic Architecture EmptyTue Oct 27, 2009 6:47 am by dimview7@verizon.net

» other than carbon nanotubes
Cosmic Architecture EmptyMon Jul 27, 2009 9:51 am by vedmecum

» software for viewing orbital
Cosmic Architecture EmptyMon Jul 27, 2009 9:16 am by vedmecum

November 2024
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Calendar Calendar

Log in

I forgot my password



Who is online?
In total there are 57 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 57 Guests

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 65 on Thu Nov 21, 2024 1:04 am

You are not connected. Please login or register

Cosmic Architecture

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1Cosmic Architecture Empty Cosmic Architecture Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:47 am

dimview7@verizon.net



Recall Michael Faraday with his ice pail. He stated that an electrical charge on an isolated body would restrict itself to the outer surface of the hosting body. This should suggest to us that mutual repulsion of excess charged particles would of course have forced reposition of those particles from wherever they had been before the charging.

No limitation of size seems applicable, so we might find the sun to be a valid hosting body subject to bearing an electrostatic charge. Consider that if that charge were negative, then a global traction would be in place to move any excess electron toward the solar surface. And were an ionizing incident upon an atom of hydrogen to remove its electron far enough from its proton so that global traction exceeded the mutual attraction of the effected particles, then the separated electron would migrate toward the solar surface and the proton would move or propagate its charge into the opposite direction: the Solar center!

Evidence is at hand that the sun does indeed present a negative charge. Hence, we should suppose that electrical particles have been following such rearrangement in our sun and other stars as an ongoing process. Other venues of such stable exothermic migration of charged particles into concentric arrays suggest a semipermanent departure from atomic structure of matter throughout the cosmos.

We might not be playing with a full deck unless we are factoring these principles into our science. They seem to implicate solar fusion, polar jets, solar corona, lightning formation and distribution, central galactic bulges and neutrino deficits.

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum